data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fb0/b7fb07c6f8b0b84e383cb88a15c9e0f3b8c944cb" alt=""
and thanks for the memories.........
and another memory of Donald Rumsfeld, with the tyrant ,
16 months after the crime in Dujail for which Saddam was hung..........
The President says the American troops safety is always on his mind and that their welfare is a top priority. That is most reassuring.
"The troops, as we head into 2007, people always ask me about a new year's resolution, my resolution is that they'll be safe." His quote from here.
No George, that is not a resolution. It may be a 'wish' or a 'hope' but not a resolution. If you were to resolve not to say something dumb in '07 that would be a resolution but sadly an impossibility. A resolution could be made to bring the troops home before next Christmas. You could even work on simple sentence construction in the New Year, instead of making matters worse in Iraq.
I came across these words from Gandhi who was commenting over at Road to Surfdom. Hope he doesn't mind me reproducing them because they cover matters very well, on the publication of the weighty Cole Report. Mr Cole is seen passing his work over to the Governor-General.
"Yet another shameful day for Australia. How many is that, folks? How many more must we endure? How many more CAN we endure, before we surrender whatever vision of “Australia” we ever held to?
Howard has found our nation’s weak point and he is exploiting it.
The Australian nation is in a dysfunctional relationship with a cheating partner. He promises her security and prosperity, but he cheats on her repeatedly and then he lies about it.
“Where were you last night, darling?”
“I was in bed with the AWB, but don’t worry - nothing happened. I promise…”
She knows he is lying, but she doesn’t dare to challenge him, not wholeheartedly. She is scared of confronting the horrible truth, and she dreads the consequences that must inevitably follow.
If our government knowingly breached the UN sanctions program against Iraq, even while millions of innocent Iraqi children were dying as a result of it; if our government then knowingly participated in a pre-planned war, in defiance of international law and the UN, to seize control of Iraq’s oil fields; if our government lied through its collective teeth to hide these facts and then, under international pressure, set up an anodyne enquiry to absolve itself of any guilt; if, with half a million or more Iraqis now dead and their entire country teetering on the precipice of bloody chaos, our Government continues to put its own survival ahead of any moral consideration; if all this and more is true, then we as a nation have lost our way, we are in the hands of mobsters, we are ruled by War Criminals in shiny suits, we are worse than a laughing stock because we have voted for these people again and again and again, even while we watched other people suffer the consequences of our poor judgement.
The desperate refugee children fished from our heaving seas, the suicidal children locked behind razor wires in desert detention centres, the charred corpses of bombed children with blackened, burned out bubbles where their eyes should be… These are the victims of our terrible misjudgement.
For the record, AWB shares went up following the report’s release."The Greens remain strong on the principles Peter once sang about.
In Victoria the Greens have preferenced Labor in 60 seats and the Liberals in none. In the others we are leaving it to the voters by having split tickets favouring neither Labor nor Liberal.
But now Labor's Peter Garrett has written to voters in key Melbourne seats falsely indicating that the Greens' pro Labor preference decision is in fact pro Liberal. This is brutal, Labor machine politics. Don't fall for it.
Labor's Peter Garrett is not Midnight Oil's Peter Garrett or the Australian Conservation Foundation's Peter Garrett. He is now an anti Greens campaigner.
Ignore him. Vote Green."
Bob Brown
Australian Greens Leader
For more information and comment please contact:
Ebony Bennett 0409 164 603
or
Dave Lane on (mob) 0419 156 213
Justin Walker | Homepage | 11.24.06 - 8:51 am | #
"I thought I heard him say that unless I am prepared to commit in advance to certain things there was no point in seeing me," Mr Howard said.
"Well, I don't commit in advance to businessmen and I certainly don't do it to high grade Irish entertainers."
Note well, those last four important words......"high grade Irish entertainers". There is still hope. He has not stopped crawling.
They have so much to share and John has found a spanking new website to interest the rock 'n' roll superstar.
Bono wishes to discuss the poor level of Australian foreign aid, which is currently only 0.3 of GDP. His wish is to have that increased to 0.7 ; not a big ask, one would have thought. More problematical is the stars expressed wish that David Hicks be freed from Guantanamo Bay. That would require the exercise of natural justice, in this case. Something that the ex-suburban lawyer, seems totally incable of understanding. He has said..........
"Because it was not a criminal offence at the time that the activity took place to train with Al Qaeda.............................
.........we do not intend to pass retrospective criminal laws. That would represent a very significant regressive move and it would violate the basis of our criminal justice system."
This bloke has been kept without trial for nearly five years by the Americans. Not making a big deal about THAT is 'regressive'. And if training with Al Queda was NOT an offence at that time, in Australia, bring him home. Remembering that it hasn't been established that he is guilty of the crime that wasn't one when he didn't commit it. Where is Rummy when you need him?
Go Bono and Amnesty International are running A PETITION on behalf of David Hicks to the P.M.......... and tanks to Ron and Susoz.
We wonder if this might mean they will preference the Greens last, as have Country Alliance and the Nationals!
The following are headings from the latest Liberal electronic newsletter all of which are self-explanatory:
"It's a fundamental principle of our law that if you are accused of something, that you're entitled to defend yourself............
And a part of being able to defend yourself is to know what you're being accused of . None of these people know what they're alleged to have done", said his lawyer , Anne Gooley, speaking of Parkin and two refugees who have been similarly treated. Now a Mr Sugar and Faisal have the right to know, as well.
The kafkaesque and "circular"nature of the mens situation was highlighted by Justice Ross Sundbergs comments. "It is, in effect, that because the applicants do not have the evidence they need, they therefore have no case, and so do not need that evidence," he said. This sought of stuff is total crap and should not be acceptable in any country that purports to be democratic. No problem with nameing people a "security threat". Just have the decency to tell them why and give them the opportunity to defend themselves.
Is your partner female or male?
In what year was she born?
In what month was she born?
Are you married to her?
In which country was your partner born?
Were her parents born in Australia?
Is she currently in paid employment?
What's her occupation?
What's her highest educational qualification?
Is your partner married, never married or divorced?
How many times has your partner been married?
How old was she when she first got married?
Excluding yourself, with how many other partners has your partner had a live in relationship of six months or more?
How old was she when she first had a live in relationship?
Are you the parent of any children that are not living with you?
How many?
Starting with the oldest, can you tell me their age, sex and month of birth?
Is your partner also the parent of these children?
Is your partner the parent of any other children that are not living with you?
How many?
Starting with the oldest, can you tell me their age and sex?
Now some questions about your partner's health:-
In the last 12months has she smoked cigarettes?
In the last 12 months has she drunk any form of alcohol?
Would that be daily, weekly, or less often?
On a day that she had alcohol how many drinks would she usually have?
Has she used cannabis?
Does she have diabetes or high blood sugar?
Is she currently taking medication prescribed by a doctor for high blood pressure, for a heart condition, for depression?
Does she have a condition or disability that hinders her mobility?
Has she ever had surgery that has had an ongoing, negative or undesirable impact on her sexual activity for example a treatment for breast or bowel cancer?
Has your partner ever been pregnant?
Has she had a tubal ligation?
Has she had an ovary removed?
Has she had a hysterectomy?
Is she currently taking an oral contraceptive like the pill?
Is she currently using HRT or similar therapy?
Has she had a menstrual period in the last 12 months?
In the last 12 months with how many different females have you had any form of sexual experience?
Other than your partner who you live with, do you currently have a regular female sexual partner or partners?
The next questions are about your relationships with your live in partner:-
How old were you when this relationship began?
How old were you when you had sex with her for the first time?
How old were you when you first met?
Do you expect to be in this relationship in 12 months time?
Do you expect that she would have sex only with you?
Do you expect to have sex only with her?
Has she had any other sex partners in the last 12 months?
When was the last time you had sex with your live in partner?
How many times in the past four weeks have you had sex with her?
In the last 12 months have you had intercourse with her during her period?
The next few questions are about your last sexual experience with her:-
The last time you had sex with her did you kiss, cuddle or hug, stroke her body, perform oral sex on her?
Did you stimulate her vaginal area with your hand?
Have vaginal intercourse?
Did she stroke your body?
Did she perform oral sex on you?
Did she stimulate your penis with her hand?
Did she stimulate herself with her hand?
Did she have an orgasm?
The last time you had any sex with a female was it with her?
In the last 12 months have you engaged in swinging or partner swapping?
In the last 12 months has your partner injected drugs that were not prescribed for her?
Does your partner have a particular religion or faith?
What is your approximate family income before tax and other deductions?
This is the pilot questionaire that La Trobe University tested out on a few unsuspecting individuals. One victim of this gross invasion of privacy contacted ABC's Health Report to complain. Her boyfriend had answered the questions without her consent. The full transcript is available here.